Task shifting between healthcare workers can reduce health costs
Citation: Seidman G, Atun R. Does task shifting yield cost savings and improve efficiency for health systems? A systematic review of evidence from low-income and middle-income countries. Human Resources for Health 2017; 15: 29
What is this? The COVID-19 pandemic is placing a great strain on health systems and healthcare workers. One way to ease this may be to use task shifting to move the care of some patient groups from more to less specialised healthcare workers.
In this systematic review, the authors searched for studies that reported program costs from a task shifted model for conducting the activity or service compared to a model that did not involve task shifting and were done in low- or middle-income countries. They restricted their search to studies published in English and did the search in March 2016. They identified 34 studies which analysed the cost implications of task shifting in sub-Saharan Africa (22 studies), Asia (8) and Central or South America (4).
What was found: Task shifting was found to vary based on the context and involved more than just transferring activities to community health workers.
Task shifting, for example to community health workers, can reduce health costs for patients and health systems in low- and middle-income countries.
The cost savings from task shifting may improve efficiency in the health system in primary care and community health care setting.
Most of the available evidence was from primary and community care settings, and the effects of task shifting within hospitals, secondary, tertiary and specialized care are uncertain.
The available evidence was spread across many disease areas, making it difficult to form conclusions about the cost savings of task shifting for specific diseases, apart from tuberculosis, HIV/AIDS and malaria.
Disclaimer: This summary has been written by staff and volunteers of Evidence Aid in order to make the content of the original document accessible to decision makers who are searching for the available evidence on the coronavirus (COVID-19) but may not have the time, initially, to read the original report in full. This summary is not intended as a substitute for the medical advice of physicians, other health workers, professional associations, guideline developers, or national governments and international agencies. If readers of this summary think that the evidence that is presented within it is relevant to their decision-making they should refer to the content and details of the original article, and the advice and guidelines offered by other sources of expertise, before making decisions. Evidence Aid cannot be held responsible for any decisions made about the coronavirus (COVID-19) on the basis of this summary alone. The text can be shared and re-used without charge, citing Evidence Aid as the source and noting the date on which you took the text.
We’ve already reached tens of thousands of people with plain language summaries of systematic reviews. If you’d like to help us to continue our work, please consider a donation.
Donate with PayPal
You can also donate through the Charities Aid Foundation (CAF) here. If you are based in the USA and want to make a tax-deductable donation, please donate to Evidence Aid via the British Schools and Universities Foundation.