Who leaves and who stays? A review and statistical meta-analysis of hurricane evacuation studies

Added August 15, 2018

Huang S.K., Lindell M.K., & Prater C.S. Who leaves and who stays? A review and statistical meta analysis of hurricane evacuation studiesEnvironment and Behavior, 2016:48(8);991-1029.

Free access: No

Official warnings, mobile home residence, risk area residence, observations of environmental (storm conditions), social behavioral cues by others, and expectation of significant personal impacts have consistently significant effects on household evacuation. Demographic variables have weaker effects on the decision to evacuate.

This statistical meta-analysis analyzed 38 studies with actual responses to hurricane warnings and 11 studies involving expected responses to hypothetical hurricane scenarios conducted since 1991. Local officials are an extremely important information sources, likely because of their perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and responsibility to protect the community. Effect sizes from actual hurricane evacuation studies are similar to those from studies involving hypothetical hurricane scenarios for 10 of the 17 variables examined. This suggests that studies carried out in a laboratory or on the Internet are also informative and can be used to examine people’s cognitive processing regarding different types of hurricane warning messages.


Disclaimer: This summary has been written by staff and volunteers of Evidence Aid in order to make the content of the original document accessible to decision makers who are searching for the available evidence for Windstorms but may not have the time, initially, to read the original report in full. This summary is not intended as a substitute for the medical advice of physicians, other health workers, professional associations, guideline developers, or national governments and international agencies. If readers of this summary think that the evidence that is presented within it is relevant to their decision-making they should refer to the content and details of the original article, and the advice and guidelines offered by other sources of expertise, before making decisions. Evidence Aid cannot be held responsible for any decisions made about Windstorms on the basis of this summary alone.