The impact of preschool feeding programmes on the growth of disadvantaged young children in developing countries
Citation: Els A., & Walsh C. The impact of preschool feeding programmes on the growth of disadvantaged young children in developing countries: A systematic review of randomised trials. South African Journal of Clinical Nutrition, (2013). 26(2), 33-40.
In view of limitations, no firm conclusion can be drawn. Additional research, aimed at determining the impact of supplementary feeding programs in supporting the growth of disadvantaged children, is encouraged.
Malnutrition in children in developing countries can lead to serious developmental problems as well as increased mortality and morbidity. Feeding programs as a strategy of treatment for childhood malnutrition have been considered to be of questionable efficiency. This review aimed to assess the efficiency of preschool feeding programs in encouraging growth of children. Most studies of the ten included in this review, showed a positive effect on recovery from malnutrition with feeding programs. Higher rates of weight gain were observed with supervised intake of food supplements. Micronutrient fortification had a positive effect on linear growth. Nutrition education may contribute to the effectiveness of interventions for malnutrition. Conclusions drawn from this review were not deemed to be firm as a result of the amount of low quality studies included. Further more risk of bias assessments were carried out by a single author with a self-designed grade system, as such the evidence for the effective use of feeding programs to treat malnutrition was insufficient.
Disclaimer: This summary has been written by staff and volunteers of Evidence Aid in order to make the content of the original document accessible to decision makers who are searching for the available evidence the prevention and treatment of malnutrition but may not have the time, initially, to read the original report in full. This summary is not intended as a substitute for the medical advice of physicians, other health workers, professional associations, guideline developers, or national governments and international agencies. If readers of this summary think that the evidence that is presented within it is relevant to their decision-making they should refer to the content and details of the original article, and the advice and guidelines offered by other sources of expertise, before making decisions. Evidence Aid cannot be held responsible for any decisions made about prevention or treatment of malnutirition on the basis of this summary alone.
If you have found this summary helpful, please consider making a donation. If everyone who looked at our COVID-19 resources gave us just £2 per month, it would fund Evidence Aid’s life-saving work.