New York State public health system response to Hurricane Sandy: An analysis of emergency reports
Citation: Hilts A.S., Mack S., Eidson M., et al. New York state public health system response to Hurricane Sandy: An analysis of emergency reports. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 2016:10(3);308-13.
Free to view: No
Post-disaster emergency reports should be reviewed systematically as they better our understanding of successes and areas for improvement. Future work should focus on collecting feedback from a broad net of public health and service provide staff in order to improve planning of preparedness and response.
A qualitative analysis was carried on Hurricane Sandy emergency reports in order to assess the New York State public health system response. This review assessed 3 after-action reports and 48 situation reports. The most cited strength was successful emergency operations coordination (e.g. interagency conference calls), whereas the most cited challenge was environmental health protection (e.g. mold and oil spills). The local health department’s emergency operations coordination was both the most cited challenge and the most cited strength. Strength aspects included sharing local resources and challenges included insufficient memorandums of understanding for coordination.
Disclaimer: This summary has been written by staff and volunteers of Evidence Aid in order to make the content of the original document accessible to decision makers who are searching for the available evidence for Windstorms but may not have the time, initially, to read the original report in full. This summary is not intended as a substitute for the medical advice of physicians, other health workers, professional associations, guideline developers, or national governments and international agencies. If readers of this summary think that the evidence that is presented within it is relevant to their decision-making they should refer to the content and details of the original article, and the advice and guidelines offered by other sources of expertise, before making decisions. Evidence Aid cannot be held responsible for any decisions made about Windstorms on the basis of this summary alone.