Maternal multiple micronutrient supplementation and pregnancy outcomes in developing countries

Added March 9, 2018

Citation: Kawai K., Spiegelman D., Shankar A.H., et al. Maternal multiple micronutrient supplementation and pregnancy outcomes in developing countries: meta-analysis and meta-regression. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2011;89(6):402-11

Maternal education or gestational age at initiation of supplementation may have contributed to the observed heterogeneous effects on perinatal mortality. The safety, efficacy and effective delivery of maternal micronutrient supplementation require further research.

Over twenty million infants are born with low birth weight every year, with one third of infant deaths being attributed to maternal and child undernutrition in developing countries. Micronutrient supplementation (MS) may have positive effects on these outcomes. This review aimed to assess randomized control trials testing micronutrient supplementation versus iron and folic acid supplementation on pregnancy outcomes. Seventeen trials were included in this review, assessed for methodological quality against strict criteria. Results showed MS to be more effective than iron and folic acid alone, at reducing the risk of low birth weight and small size for age. A decreased risk of perinatal mortality with MS was observed in sub group analysis in specific conditions, however, no overall effect was observed.


Disclaimer: This summary has been written by staff and volunteers of Evidence Aid in order to make the content of the original document accessible to decision makers who are searching for the available evidence the prevention and treatment of malnutrition but may not have the time, initially, to read the original report in full. This summary is not intended as a substitute for the medical advice of physicians, other health workers, professional associations, guideline developers, or national governments and international agencies. If readers of this summary think that the evidence that is presented within it is relevant to their decision-making they should refer to the content and details of the original article, and the advice and guidelines offered by other sources of expertise, before making decisions. Evidence Aid cannot be held responsible for any decisions made about prevention or treatment of malnutirition on the basis of this summary alone.