Interventions to improve the economic self-sufficiency and well-being of resettled refugees
Citation: Ott E., Montgomery P. Interventions to improve the economic self-sufficiency and well-being of resettled refugees: A systematic review. Campbell Collaboration Library 2015-01-02 Volume 11, number 4.
The review could not assert any conclusions regarding the efficacy of programmes designed to improve the economic self-sufficiency and well-being of resettled refugees. No studies met the review’s inclusion criteria, highlighting a lack of available evidence.
As of 2012, twenty-six countries offered programmes to improve economic self-sufficiency and well-being for resettled refugees. These programmes may include employment training, education, and mental health services. The authors of this review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of these interventions in improving economic self-sufficiency and well-being of refugee populations. Identified primary outcomes included participants’ labour force participation rate, employment rate, use of cash assistance, income, job retention, and quality of life. Inclusion criteria included prospective controlled methodology and appropriate population sample. Eighteen databases were searched to yield 8,264 records, in addition to 996 records derived from other sources. Twenty-seven studies were reviewed in full-text by the review authors. However, none of the search results met the predefined review criteria. As such, this systematic review highlights the current gap in evidence regarding the efficacy of such programmes.
Disclaimer: This summary has been written by staff and volunteers of Evidence Aid in order to make the content of the original document accessible to decision makers who are searching for the available evidence on the health of refugees and asylum seekers but may not have the time, initially, to read the original report in full. This summary is not intended as a substitute for the medical advice of physicians, other health workers, professional associations, guideline developers, or national governments and international agencies. If readers of this summary think that the evidence that is presented within it is relevant to their decision-making they should refer to the content and details of the original article, and the advice and guidelines offered by other sources of expertise, before making decisions. Evidence Aid cannot be held responsible for any decisions made about the health of refugees and asylum seekers on the basis of this summary alone.
If you have found this summary helpful, please consider making a donation. If everyone who looked at our COVID-19 resources gave us just £2 per month, it would fund Evidence Aid’s life-saving work.