Infant feeding policies in maternity wards and their effect on breast-feeding success
Citation: Pérez-Escamilla R., Pollitt E., Lönnerdal B., et al. Infant feeding policies in maternity wards and their effect on breast-feeding success: An analytical overview. American Journal of Public Health. 1994;84(1):89-97.
This review presents strong evidence that several of the infant feeding programs recommended by WHO and UNICEF can have a positive impact on the chances of lactation. However, it also shows that the impact of other maternity programs could not be properly assessed due to significant methodological problems present in the studies.
Lactation and successful breastfeeding are very important in the first months of a child’s life. Recently there has been a resurgence of interest in how infant feeding programs can be beneficial in influencing successful lactation. This study aims to assess the relationship between maternity practices and successful lactation. Eighteen studies have been included in this review for meta-analysis. The results have shown that commercial baby formulas have a negative effect on successful lactation. Being in the same room as your baby, following breastfeeding advice and breastfeeding on demand have been positively associated with successful breastfeeding and lactation. The effects of very early contact between mother and child, on lactation, are not clearly identified. Supplements provided by hospitals have not been associated with failures to breastfeed. In conclusion, hospital interventions can have beneficial effects on successful lactation.
Disclaimer: This summary has been written by staff and volunteers of Evidence Aid in order to make the content of the original document accessible to decision makers who are searching for the available evidence the prevention and treatment of malnutrition but may not have the time, initially, to read the original report in full. This summary is not intended as a substitute for the medical advice of physicians, other health workers, professional associations, guideline developers, or national governments and international agencies. If readers of this summary think that the evidence that is presented within it is relevant to their decision-making they should refer to the content and details of the original article, and the advice and guidelines offered by other sources of expertise, before making decisions. Evidence Aid cannot be held responsible for any decisions made about prevention or treatment of malnutirition on the basis of this summary alone.
We’ve already reached tens of thousands of people with plain language summaries of systematic reviews. If you’d like to help us to continue our work, please consider a donation.
Donate with PayPal
You can also donate through the Charities Aid Foundation (CAF) here. If you are based in the USA and want to make a tax-deductable donation, please donate to Evidence Aid via the British Schools and Universities Foundation.