Financial benefits for child health and well‐being in low income or socially disadvantaged families in high-income countries
Citation: Lucas PJ, McIntosh K, Petticrew M, et al. Financial benefits for child health and well‐being in low income or socially disadvantaged families in developed world countries. Campbell Systematic Reviews 2008; 4(1): 1-93
What is this: The COVID-19 pandemic and its associated measures have led to job losses and reductions in family income, placing more families in financial difficulties. School and business closures are also keeping children at home, and may increase family stress and negatively affect children’s well-being. Existing research on financial benefits for child health might provide useful information for policy makers.
In this Campbell systematic review, the authors searched for studies of the effects of financial benefits for socioeconomically disadvantaged families. They did not restrict their searches by date or language of publication and did their most recent search in June 2006. They included nine randomised trials (total: >25,000 participants), which were from Canada (1 study) and the USA (8).
What was found: The monetary value of many interventions was found to be low. For a whole family, this level of income increase may have been too small to have an impact on child well-being. Also, many of the programmes were limited to assessing the effects on temporary, short-term benefits and required parents to comply with work requirements
A small increase in monies provided to poor and socially disadvantaged families tied to work requirements did not seem to improve children’s health or well-being.
Disclaimer: This summary has been written by staff and volunteers of Evidence Aid in order to make the content of the original document accessible to decision makers who are searching for the available evidence on the coronavirus (COVID-19) but may not have the time, initially, to read the original report in full. This summary is not intended as a substitute for the medical advice of physicians, other health workers, professional associations, guideline developers, or national governments and international agencies. If readers of this summary think that the evidence that is presented within it is relevant to their decision-making they should refer to the content and details of the original article, and the advice and guidelines offered by other sources of expertise, before making decisions. Evidence Aid cannot be held responsible for any decisions made about the coronavirus (COVID-19) on the basis of this summary alone.
If you have found this summary helpful, please consider making a donation. If everyone who looked at our COVID-19 resources gave us just £2 per month, it would fund Evidence Aid’s life-saving work.