Effects of micronutrients on growth of children under 5 y of age
Citation: Ramakrishnan U., Nguyen P., Martorell R. Effects of micronutrients on growth of children under 5 y of age: meta-analyses of single and multiple nutrient interventions. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2009;89(1):191–203
Micronutrient interventions containing iron only, vitamin A only, and combinations of iron and zinc, iron and vitamin A, and zinc and vitamin A do not improve growth in height, weight, or WHZ in children aged < 5 y. Interventions containing zinc only have a small positive effect on change in WHZ but do not improve height or weight gain in young children. Multi-micronutrient (MM) interventions have a small effect only on growth in height.
Provision of micronutrients may represent a strategy to improve child health, however, the effects micronutrients have on child growth is still considered unclear. This meta-analysis looks at the effects of micronutrient intervention on the growth of children aged five or younger. This paper analyzes randomized control trials to limit the risk of bias results. Results show micronutrient interventions of zinc only, have an effect on weight-for-height z scores in children aged 5 or younger. Other micronutrient interventions do not improve growth in weight, height or weight-for-height z scores. Multi-micronutrient interventions have a small effect on growth in height for children.
Disclaimer: This summary has been written by staff and volunteers of Evidence Aid in order to make the content of the original document accessible to decision makers who are searching for the available evidence the prevention and treatment of malnutrition but may not have the time, initially, to read the original report in full. This summary is not intended as a substitute for the medical advice of physicians, other health workers, professional associations, guideline developers, or national governments and international agencies. If readers of this summary think that the evidence that is presented within it is relevant to their decision-making they should refer to the content and details of the original article, and the advice and guidelines offered by other sources of expertise, before making decisions. Evidence Aid cannot be held responsible for any decisions made about prevention or treatment of malnutirition on the basis of this summary alone.
We’ve already reached tens of thousands of people with plain language summaries of systematic reviews. If you’d like to help us to continue our work, please consider a donation.
Donate with PayPal
You can also donate through the Charities Aid Foundation (CAF) here. If you are based in the USA and want to make a tax-deductable donation, please donate to Evidence Aid via the British Schools and Universities Foundation.