Community‐based rehabilitation interventions for people with disabilities in low‐and middle‐income countries are effective
Citation: Iemmi V, Gibson L, Blanchet K, et al. Community‐based rehabilitation for people with disabilities in low‐and middle‐income countries: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews 2015; 11(1): 1-177
What is this: The COVID-19 pandemic is placing a strain on health and social care services. Existing research on community‐based rehabilitation for people with disabilities may provide policy makers with information to help with this.
In this Campbell systematic review, the authors searched for research that compared different types of community‐based rehabilitation interventions in low‐ and middle‐income countries for people with physical and mental disabilities. They restricted their search to studies published after 1976 but did not restrict by type or language of publication and did their search in July 2012. They included 10 randomised trials, 2 non‐randomised controlled studies, 2 controlled before‐after studies and 1 interrupted time series study. The studies focussed on physical disabilities (6 studies) or mental disabilities (9).
What works: Community‐based rehabilitation interventions improved clinical outcomes and enhanced functioning and quality of life of people with a disability in low- and middle-income countries.
Community‐based rehabilitation interventions had positive impact on the lives of people with physical disabilities (stroke and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) and people with mental disabilities (schizophrenia, dementia and intellectual impairment), and for the carers of people with dementia.
What doesn’t work: Nothing noted.
What is uncertain: The cost-effectiveness of community‐based rehabilitation for people with disabilities in low‐and middle‐income countries is uncertain.
Disclaimer: This summary has been written by staff and volunteers of Evidence Aid in order to make the content of the original document accessible to decision makers who are searching for the available evidence on the coronavirus (COVID-19) but may not have the time, initially, to read the original report in full. This summary is not intended as a substitute for the medical advice of physicians, other health workers, professional associations, guideline developers, or national governments and international agencies. If readers of this summary think that the evidence that is presented within it is relevant to their decision-making they should refer to the content and details of the original article, and the advice and guidelines offered by other sources of expertise, before making decisions. Evidence Aid cannot be held responsible for any decisions made about the coronavirus (COVID-19) on the basis of this summary alone.
If you have found this summary helpful, please consider making a donation. If everyone who looked at our COVID-19 resources gave us just £2 per month, it would fund Evidence Aid’s life-saving work.