Certification schemes for agricultural production in low‐ and middle‐income countries
Citation: Oya C, Schaefer F, Skalidou D, McCosker C, Langer L. Effects of certification schemes for agricultural production on socio‐economic outcomes in low‐ and middle‐income countries: a systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews. 2017;13(1):1-346.
What is this? The COVID-19 pandemic has decreased agricultural production, reduced the supply of workers, damaged food supply chains and increased food insecurity. Existing research on certification schemes to improve agricultural production might provide useful information for those planning the response to the COVID-19 pandemic and seeking to boost agricultural production.
In this Campbell systematic review, the authors searched for studies of certification schemes on agricultural producers and for qualitative studies to answer questions about barriers and contextual factors. They did not restrict their searches by date or language of publication and did the search in November 2015. The quantitative systematic review included 43 quasi-experiments and 136 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis.
What was found: Income from the sale of produce is higher for certified farmers, but overall household income was not.
Workers’ wages do not seem to benefit from the presence of certification schemes.
At the time of this review, there was insufficient evidence on the effects of certification schemes on a range of intermediate and final socio-economic outcomes for agricultural producers and workers.
Disclaimer: This summary has been written by staff and volunteers of Evidence Aid in order to make the content of the original document accessible to decision makers who are searching for the available evidence on the coronavirus (COVID-19) but may not have the time, initially, to read the original report in full. This summary is not intended as a substitute for the medical advice of physicians, other health workers, professional associations, guideline developers, or national governments and international agencies. If readers of this summary think that the evidence that is presented within it is relevant to their decision-making they should refer to the content and details of the original article, and the advice and guidelines offered by other sources of expertise, before making decisions. Evidence Aid cannot be held responsible for any decisions made about the coronavirus (COVID-19) on the basis of this summary alone.
If you have found this summary helpful, please consider making a donation. If everyone who looked at our COVID-19 resources gave us just £2 per month, it would fund Evidence Aid’s life-saving work.